OA PARISH INITIATIVES
Anglo Catholics
Blog Index
The journal that this archive was targeting has been deleted. Please update your configuration.
Navigation

 Means of Grace, Hope of Glory

 

Friday
Mar192021

Generous, kind, open hearted

It’s the Feast of Saint Joseph. Matthew 1:18-25 is a Daily Office reading.

My parish priest occasionally notes how our parishioners give one another some “slack.” I think he means “slack” in the sense of giving one another some space and being slow to judge rather than meaning lazy and loose. It’s a posture that offers people time to take a stance that is generous, kind, and open hearted. I think it goes along with “being slow to anger.” I see it as the realization that we humans often need a pathway into our better selves, into holiness of life. Our first, gut response may be understandable, even just in some manner. Something has taken place that offends and hurts. Our anger rises to meet the offense and the offender. Such moments override any instinct we may have to show compassion to the offender. So, it is righteous to give some slack, allow some space between our feelings and our action, give a few moments for God to act.

 

Beyond kindness to sacrifice

Blessed Joseph was a righteous man. So, he quickly acts with kindness toward Mary. She’s unmarried and “with child.” That’s not acceptable in his world. Problematic for so many reasons. The marriage can’t happen. But his stance was to avoid embarrassing her; “unwilling to expose her to public disgrace.” He would “dismiss her quietly.” Joseph’s starting place is kinder than what might have been expected.

And in that moment between resolving to be kind in sending Mary away and acting—God acts.

“Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary as your wife, for the child conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will bear a son, and you are to name him Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.”

The saint had fallen asleep. He had a dream. There was an angel. There would be a family. The son would be named Jesus.

Today’s collect calls Joseph “the guardian of your incarnate Son and the spouse of his virgin mother.” In our piety it can be easy to lose track of how radical that is. How out of culture and difficult.

 

There has to be something on the other side of anger

What happen at the Capital on the Feast of the Epiphany was horrifying. Hundreds of the offenders will face trial and many will serve time in prison. That’s as it should be. Still, those investigating have said that many of them were caught up in the mob’s motion. It’s not an excuse. It’s what Reinhold Niebuhr was getting it in writing “Moral Man and in Immoral Society.” We see the same on the other side of our political life. It scares me less because it’s more my tribe. This group is more given to social media and the destruction of lives rather than property.  Still, they get caught up in the mob’s motion. David Brooks wrote of them this morning, “I’ve tried to envision a way to promote social change that doesn’t involve destroying people’s careers over a bad tweet, that doesn’t reduce peoples to simplistic labels, that is more about a positive agenda to redistribute power to the marginalized then it is about simply blotting out the unworthy.”[i]

Before I, or you, get all caught up in our own motion we might take a moment of reflection, even pity, for those caught in illusion. Brooks wrote about his conversation with Esau McCaulley that included the case made by Howard Thurman “that hatred is a great motivator, but it burns down more than the object of its ire. You can feel rage but there has to be something on the other side of anger.” What’s on the other side is forgiveness and reconciliation.

 

An inner core of silence

In “Reaching Out Without Dumbing Down” Marva Dawn wrote,

It is impossible for our inner selves to be prepared to be open to God and receptive to God’s Word until we silence our sinful selves—our efforts to be in control, to manipulate everything and everyone to accomplish our own purposes....We need the channel of silence to transport us from the busy harbors of our tensions out to the ocean of God’s infinite being.

Getting to the other side of anger, getting to forgiveness and reconciliation, often involves allowing some slack. Getting to a place of generosity, kindness, and open heartedness often involves allowing some space between our feelings and our action, giving a few moments for God to act. Sleeping on it. A dream. A channel of silence. A bit of contemplation. Maybe an angel.

 

rag+

 

Related

Reflection seen as an element of a broad, full spiritual life  

    The Threefold Rule of Prayer     In Your Holy Spirit Model  Contemplation - Intercession - Action

    More on the threefold rule of prayer

 

The Relationship of contemplation and action  

Through prayer  

 

 


[i] A Christian Vision of Social Justice, David Brooks, New York Times, March 19, 2021

Wednesday
Mar102021

Obedience

We had a conversation yesterday with the novices in the Order of the Ascension about the ways the elements of the Benedictine Promise (Stability, Obedience, and Conversion of Life) work together, influencing and shaping the whole.  It was particularly helpful in this time where our normal sense of stability is shaken to recall the ways in which our parishes do offer stability, including through the Daily Office, Sunday worship in whatever form that takes, and opportunities to stay connected with one another. 

A key point we covered is that faithful Conversion of Life is grounded in our Stability and our Obedience. We don’t change for the sake of change: we enter fully into this life as it is now, with these people, in this place, and we listen carefully for where the Holy Spirit is calling us to go. That listening includes taking seriously – being obedient to – our sources of authority, including scripture, tradition, priests and bishops, and our own conscience, as well as one another. We talked about how all of these elements of Benedictine spiritually exist on a spectrum. Rigid adherence to one way of Stability – for example, insisting that masculine images of God must be excised or insisting they must be used exclusively – is a distortion of Stability. So is claiming the Spirit requires us to change when mostly we’re drawn to change because we like it or maybe we’re bored or maybe we’re anxious about what we’ll find out if we stick with things that are uncomfortable. 

As happens, the conversation turned to the often-visceral negative response many of us have to that word “obedience.” Many find it helpful to learn the word comes from the Latin verb “to listen,” and it is common to see writers on Benedictine spirituality talk about “obedience, holy listening” in a single phrase.  And in the Order of the Ascension we spend a lot of time helping members develop and use listening processes in the parish, explicitly connected to deepening the expression of Benedictine spirituality.  Of course, we’ve all been in places where they listen so much they never make a decision! That, too, is a distortion. 

It’s critical to remember that obedience isn’t only deep listening or only doing what we’re supposed to, but it requires elements of both. Obedience exists on a spectrum where we have to hold a number of things in tension, something we Anglicans have a lot of practice with. 

I think that’s all great. We need ways to talk about spiritual life that both make it easy for people to learn and ways to encourage deeper engagement for those ready to do that. My concern is that sometimes when we talk about listening, what that really means is listening to the stuff we like and ignoring what we don’t.  One example of the challenge of Episcopal Church culture is that we value the BCP and our liturgy so much - an obvious product of external authority - but have such a tough time with the concept of submitting to authority generally.  

Our ethos has a built-in comprehensiveness, a capacity for holding seemingly contradictory things in tension. I submit that while there are exceptions, our fault as a church is not pushing folks to blindly surrender their conscience. But I also see a fair amount of angst over the idea that we don’t get to be in charge of everything.  

In my work I get to I hear a number of parish conversations and there’s sometimes a sense that whatever way “we” do things in this parish is the “right” way, even if that conflicts with Prayer Book rubrics, or the teachings of bishops.  One priest was joking about not following the rules concerning celebrations of the Eucharist in this weird virtual time, and she seemed pretty pleased, in a light-hearted way, about breaking the rules. My own view was that the particular issue wasn’t that significant and there were solid pastoral reasons for doing what she was doing in these particular circumstances.  What struck me, though, was that the parishioners who spoke up clearly thought the bishop was being unreasonably dictatorial in even trying to control this issue. I heard no curiosity about why he might be doing that or any concern that perhaps there were issues in this beyond the immediate preference of the priest or the parish. It may be that true obedience leads to breaking rules in some cases, but when we do that reflexively or dismissively, we’re not really listening and we’re not practicing meaningful obedience. 

As a denomination, we can be a pretty free-wheeling bunch. At the same time, there are things that should and actually do transcend our personal preferences and inclinations.  While I find the “listening” approach very helpful (and believe it’s critical to development of healthy parishes), I also find myself thinking that leaders would do well to spend more time contemplating their own aversion to straight-up “obedience” and spend just slightly less time making it more palatable by calling it “listening.” The ability to engage our own difficulty with healthy obedience is the first step in helping our parishioners do so. And I can’t help but think that healthy obedience is something we could all use a lot more of, both in the nation and in the church. 

Michelle Heyne, OA

Presiding Sister

Order of the Ascension

 

 

Related

The Benedictine Promise 

Benedictine Spirituality and the Parish Church 

The Benedictine DNA of the Episcopal Church 

A life not a program

Fake Listening

Trust, listening, complete messages, and cooperation 

Not listening: I have the power; get reconciled to it  

Seeking parish harmony  

Thursday
Feb112021

More Lent

One week from today, we will be in Lent. Again.

If you’re anything like me, it feels like we never left the last Lent. I’m wondering how much Lenty-er our lives can get. How much more can we give up? Can we really find the energy to do this again – to prepare again for an Easter that feels like it’ll never come?

I understand this hesitation – I really do. We are all feeling so tired and deprived already. But I think this actually means that we need more Lent, not less.

Because Lent, at its heart, is a season about getting close to God. We tend to think of it as a time of great solemnity – of abstinence and penitence. And it can be all of those things, of course. But all of those things are a part of this season because, ultimately, they bring us closer to God. If material things – food, alcohol, screens – are getting between you and God, then Lent invites you to give them up. If your sin – those things done and left undone – is what’s blocking you from God’s love, then Lent invites you to confess it and make amends. Lent is never about self-denial for its own sake, only for the sake of increasing our openness to the Grace that God is pouring out on us every day.

So this year, we need more Lent, not less. Maybe giving something up doesn’t feel helpful. Maybe your life feels austere enough, thank you very much. But there are ways for you to draw closer to God, or, more accurately, to open the door to find God drawing close to you. Lent is a season of rich and holy reward, built upon the hope that at the end of this season we will find nothing less than all of God’s love, all of God’s life, given for us.

One week from today, we will be in Lent. Again. Hallelujah.

 

Yours in Christ,

The Very Rev’d Erika L. Takacs

Rector, Church of the Atonement, Chicago

----------------------------------------------- 

 

Related 

The website posting 

A Prayer Book Lent 2020

Pick yourself up, be sorry, shake yourself, and go on again

Solitude: just begin

The work of a people  

Friday
Feb052021

The Ministry of the Baptized

Offered without comment. For your reflection and comments, if you wish.

 

The church has an abundance of programs and resources for equipping the laity. Vestry and warden conferences. Treasurer workshops.  Liturgical ministry programs. Training lay ministers to assist clergy in ministering to the hurt, sick, and troubled members of their parishes.

 

And then there’s this -

 

 

 

rag+

 

Related

A developmental initiative  

Parish life lacking any sort of contemplative focus

The church's influence in society 

God's harmony

Breakfast with Frances Perkins  

Christian action 

 

 

Sunday
Jan102021

Be angry

 

 In the parish I attend we have a shared homily.  Fr. Kevin usually sends a video of his homily the day before. He then offers a short version after the gospel reading. Then he invites the congregation to share their response. Sometimes it’s a powerful, grace filled experience. All on Zoom.

This morning some of us shared our anger. On the Feast of the Epiphany (as noted by Speaker Pelosi with prayer) vandals breached the sacred space, destroyed sacramental artifacts, and interrupted the tradition of ages. And as often happens when such sacrilege occurs—someone dies. So, we spoke of anger.

Some were disturbed by their own anger. Saint Paul tells us “Be angry.” Yes, I know there is more to the passage. But let that sink in a bit – “Be angry.”

There’s a lot of anger in our country at the moment. There’s anger at the vandals of Wednesday and their cheerleaders.  And in a much lesser way, at those who rioted this summer and those who rationalized their violence. Anger at those who would use legitimate first amendment expression as a cover for violence. And just to be clear—no, those acts of the summer don’t come close to what happened on Wednesday. Still, moral responsibly doesn’t allow excuses for lesser acts of violence. This year has seen too much violence.

 

God’s anger

 

Our Lord appears to be angry rather frequently. Anger in regard to injustice and oppression is faithful and necessary. The Scriptures offer us a God who gets angry. Do a search and you’ll find many examples. Here’s a few.

Ah, you who make iniquitous decrees,
   who write oppressive statutes,
to turn aside the needy from justice
   and to rob the poor of my people of their right,
that widows may be your spoil,
   and that you may make the orphans your prey!
What will you do on the day of punishment,
   in the calamity that will come from far away?
To whom will you flee for help,
   and where will you leave your wealth,
(Isaiah 10:1-3)

Somewhere along the line some of us were taught to separate the Old Testament God from the New Testament God. That’s mostly nonsense.

Then Jesus entered the temple and drove out all who were selling and buying in the temple, and he overturned the tables of the money-changers and the seats of those who sold doves. He said to them, ‘It is written,
“My house shall be called a house of prayer”;
   but you are making it a den of robbers.’
(Matthew 21:12-13)

And

Again he entered the synagogue, and a man was there who had a withered hand. They watched him to see whether he would cure him on the sabbath, so that they might accuse him. And he said to the man who had the withered hand, ‘Come forward.’ Then he said to them, ‘Is it lawful to do good or to do harm on the sabbath, to save life or to kill?’ But they were silent. He looked around at them with anger; he was grieved at their hardness of heart and said to the man, ‘Stretch out your hand.’ He stretched it out, and his hand was restored. The Pharisees went out and immediately conspired with the Herodians against him, how to destroy him. (Mark: 3:1-6)

Jesus’ anger is the righteous indignation of God. Sometimes our anger is our participation in the Divine Life—"Grant that we may share the divine life of him who humbled himself to share our humanity (Collect, 2nd Sunday after Christmas Day). I usually think of that prayer as being about our participation in the love of God, in the work of God. I rarely think of it as participation in God’s anger.

I say the psalms daily. It’s part of the Benedictine grounding of the Episcopal Church. In that tradition when we say the psalms in the Daily Office, we don’t skip the nasty verses, the angry verses. Even when they seem violent. It’s as though sometime God is saying, “I’m so angry I could kill you.”  

 

Be angry but do not sin

 

So, there’s part two. Do not sin.

Our anger poisons the well. It poisons the well of the community; it poisons the well of our soul. Allow it for a time. But not a long time—" do not let the sun go down on your anger, and do not make room for the devil.” The saint’s guidance is to be timely in moving past our anger.

There’s more.

You must understand this, my beloved: let everyone be quick to listen, slow to speak, slow to anger; for your anger does not produce God’s righteousness. (James 1:19-20)

There we are. We are to be quick to let go of our anger and we are to be slow to get angry.

Further into James we hear this.

Those conflicts and disputes among you, where do they come from? Do they not come from your cravings that are at war within you? You want something and do not have it; so you commit murder. And you covet something and cannot obtain it; so you engage in disputes and conflicts. You do not have, because you do not ask. (James 4:1-2)

Your 21st Century therapist will invite you to look inside yourself. What is at war within you?

The training received by members of the Order of the Ascension includes attention to what’s called emotional intelligence and “use of self.”  One of the skills to learn is in the area of self-regulation.  There are a number of elements involved, e.g., trustworthiness, adaptability. But the first item on the list is self-control: “Managing disruptive emotions and impulses. People with this competence: manage their impulsive feelings and distressing emotions well; stay composed, positive, and unflappable even in trying moments.; think clearly and stay focused under pressure.

Anger is something we can manage. We can decide to stop feeding our anger. We can decide to not indulge our anger. We can decide to turn our anger in a direction that is truer and more productive. How? One route is to ask what lies within and under our anger. What we will usually find is hurt and sadness.  There is humanity and vulnerability in acknowledging our sadness. We can participate in God's sadness. A second way to turn our anger toward holiness is to pray. Pray for those tempted to violence, for the victims of violence, for the police officers and medics who did their duty on that day, for political leaders who stayed true, and yes, for our enemies, for those who have behaved badly, those who have enabled evil, those who remain blind. And one more way--take an action. Hear Martin Thornton, "...Aquinas got it right: prayer is 'loving God in act so that the divine life can communicate itself to us and through us to the world. ' Christian action is not action of which Jesus approves but action that he performs through his incorporated, and therefore prayerful, disciples." Again, we may participant in the very life of God by our action. Write a letter to a political leader. Read a book on the US Constitution. Buy an American flag. Have a conversation with someone you don't agree with, stay calm and respectful. Press back against false narratives like the police enabled the rioters [iii] 

 


Confusing isn’t it?

 

Confusing isn’t it? How do we know our anger is participation in God’s anger vs. an anger that is self-indulgent?  When is not being angry a sin and when is being angry a sin? And how can we see it when an anger that begins “in God” turns into an anger that is self-indulgent?

Just a few thoughts. 

First, humility. Beware of our human tendency to rationalize and justify ourselves. Use the practices of faith to keep a check on it—reflection and self-examination, sacramental confession.

Second, recall holiness of life is your destiny.[i] That the Holy Spirit is at work within you. Blessed Paul wrote, in Ephesians that we are to grow into the full stature of Christ; that the graces and practices necessary for that growth are humility, gentleness, patience, forbearance born of love, eagerness to maintain unity in the bond of peace, truthfulness mediated in love, mutual kindness, tenderheartedness and forgiveness; and in Galatians that the fruit of the spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control.

Also, recall your baptism into “an inquiring and discerning heart, the courage to will and to persevere, a spirit to know and to love (God), and the gift of joy and wonder in all (God’s) works.

Finally, you're an Anglican! Complexity and paradox are part of how we understand God and the ways of God. Father Jim Fenhagen, one time Dean of General Seminary wrote, "Rather than doctrinal uniformity … being able to hold together seeming opposites."  John Westerhoff wrote that "truth is known and guarded by maintaining the tension between counter-opposite statements concerning truth … personal freedom and communal responsibility … sacred and secular." This stance toward truth goes hand in hand with our tradition valuing ambiguity and openness. We tolerate a certain kind of theological messiness as we wait to see more clearly.  We live with differences.

All this is what God is doing with each of us. Our task, call it virtue or call it learning emotional intelligence, is to cooperate with God.

 

And the connection with parish development?

 

The parish has three primary purposes: 1) the worship of God, 2) the formation of the People of God, and 3) to be a sanctifying presence in the community.

Guiding people in regard to anger is part of the formation task. Those at the center who are given to prayer and spiritual discipline will be quickest to understand. And, the seed needs to be planted for all to receive.

Learning to manage our anger is an essential aspect of the process of reconciliation. In all parishes people get angry with one another. The unity and harmony of the parish depends on enough people being proficient in the skills of reconciliation.[ii]

rag+

 


[i] See “What kind of person is being formed”

[ii] “The Church’s way of reconciliation and forgiveness” and “Grumbling and Conflict”

[iii] Regarding false narratives - regarding the police: Officer Eugene Goodman leading the rioters away from the Senate Chambers, The officer attacked in a doorway, Officer Brian D. Sicknick murdered and rioters being tracked down and arrested.  In other news articles you'll find partisan speculation, e.g., From the Right: if the protesters were Black they'd be allowed to set up an autonomous zone and would face no charges and From the Left: if they were Black the police would have killed many of them. Of course, either is possible. It's also possible that authorities would have learned from their earlier mistakes and neither of these scenarios would have happened. This kind of speculation is one step away from conspiracy theories. We're also getting a lot of updates on what actually happened. For example, the Washington Post initially reported incorrectly that the Pentagon had “denied” National Guard reinforcements.Then another story titled “Pentagon placed limits on D.C. Guard ahead of pro-Trump protests due to narrow mission.” The implication being that Trump appointees at the Pentagon decided to slow-walk reinforcements to overwhelmed police forces. The story was then updated to reflect that the restraints were placed on the National Guard “in response to a request from the D.C. mayor."  I know that I had no trouble accepting the first story. Yet. as it turns out the story was wrong. It wasn't "fake news" as though someone was trying to mislead me. It was either what a reporter knew at the time or was speculation. On the other hand, we still don't know why Governor Hogan's offer to send in MD National Guard units was not quickly accepted. More is likely to be revealed in the coming days. We are called not only to be slow to anger but slow to assume that we understand complex and confusing events.

On 1-11-21 the New York Times published "Inside a Deadly Siege." The report notes failures at many levels of government. There will be a lot of competition in trying to spin the story so one party or another is made to appear more or less responsible. Many decisions appear to have been based on what some saw as an over reaction to protests in DC this summer. One thing is certain. The story will change in the days and months ahead as more information is gathered and there is time for reflection.  

 

Resources

Here in Seattle there's a reporter who moderates a program called "The Divide."  Today she offered useful advice that seems very aligned with Saint Paul.

On how we each can take responsibility for the division in our nation

On what happened to our Seattle Representative - the first segment in the broadcast

 

Then three other pieces

Seattle man charged with assaulting federal officer during US Capitol riot - It's all rather close to home as the vandals get arrested across the country.

Capitol police were overrun, 'left naked' against rioters - Many acted with great courage that day. They did their duty. 

Keep this nation under your care - An earlier posting on our duty